Full Press Release Appears Below
Highlights
ROCHESTER, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As energy costs continue to soar, and an increased reliance on traditional oil and coal is questioned, alternate sources of energy are examined more closely. Many in the five largest countries in Europe and in the United States like the idea of renewable energy, but do not want to pay any more for renewable energy sources. A majority of adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills in Great Britain (54%) and Germany (50%), pluralities in Italy (44%), France (42%) and the U.S. (40%), as well as just over one-third of adults responsible for paying household energy bills in Spain (35%), all say they would be willing to pay nothing more for energy if it was from renewable sources.
These are some of the results of a Financial Times/Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a total of 6,448 adults aged 16 to 64 within France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain and the United States, and adults aged 18 to 64 in Italy, between January 30 and February 8, 2008.
When this decision of paying more is translated into actual currency, it makes it even less likely that people will be willing to pay more. Using European Commission estimates that it would cost each household an extra €150, £110 or $220 (depending on country) per month to cut greenhouse gasses and get more renewable energy, strong majorities of adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills in all six countries say they would be not at all likely to pay this extra amount.
Looking at taxes on cars, here majorities favor a higher tax on higher carbon emission cars. From a high of 78 percent of adults favoring this idea in Spain to a low of just over half (53%) of adults favoring it in the U.S., it is a winning idea. An even stronger idea is that of having a lower tax on lower carbon emission cars. At least three-quarters of adults in all six countries favor this idea. In fact, majorities of Italians (53%) and Spaniards (55%) strongly favor lower taxes on lower carbon emitting cars.
Building New Sources of Energy
Looking specifically to two sources of energy – nuclear and wind – majorities of adults in these six countries are in favor of one type and mixed on the other. When it comes to the number of wind farms in their country, strong majorities in all six countries (from 79% to 92%) are in favor of seeing a large increase. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, produces more mixed feelings. A majority of Italians (58%) are in favor of building new nuclear plants in their country. Two-thirds of Spaniards (68%) as well as 64 percent of Germans and just over half (55%) of adults in Great Britain, however, are all opposed to building new power plants in their respective countries. France and the U.S. are more closely divided. In France, 51 percent are opposed while in the U.S., 52 percent favor building new power plants.
Government Subsidies
When it comes to actually having the government create a financial subsidy for the development of nuclear power, the feeling equals those of building new plants. Italians are most supportive, as three in five (62%) are in favor of such a subsidy. Majorities in Germany (66%), Spain (64%), Great Britain (58%) and the U.S. (54%) are all opposed to a subsidy for nuclear power development. Again, France is the most divided as 52 percent oppose this subsidy while 48 percent would be in favor of it. Bio-fuels, however, are a different story. Strong majorities in all six countries (from 65% in Germany to 90% in Italy) would favor a government subsidy for bio-fuels.
So What?
Support for bio-fuels and wind farms is strong across these six countries. But, what is also clear is that while people support renewable electricity, they are not willing to actually pay more for these alternative types of energy. Until people are forced to do so, or the price for renewable energy comes down considerably, people will not make the “green” choice. This is especially true as economies around the globe tighten. When it comes to food or solar power, food will win for the consumer each time.
| TABLE 1 | |||||||||||
| PAYING MORE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY | |||||||||||
"How much of an increase would you be willing to pay at the most for energy if it were from renewable sources?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 884 | 934 | 807 | 848 | 968 | 787 | |||||
| Nothing more | 54 | 42 | 44 | 35 | 50 | 40 | |||||
| 5% more | 18 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 22 | 17 | |||||
| 10% more | 12 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 17 | |||||
| 15% more | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 7 | |||||
| 20% more | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||
| 30% more | 1 | * | * | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 40% more | 1 | * | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Not sure | 10 | 10 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 11 | |||||
| AVERAGE | 3.9% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 6.1% | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 2 | |||||||||||
| LIKELIHOOD OF PAYING MORE EACH MONTH FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY | |||||||||||
"The European Commission estimates it would cost each household an extra (EUR 150, GBP 110, $220) on a monthly basis on gas and electricity bills to cut green house emissions and get more renewable energy. Given the choice, how likely would you be to pay this extra (EUR 150, GBP 110, $220) per month?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults who have some form of responsibility for paying household energy bills |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 884 | 934 | 807 | 848 | 968 | 787 | |||||
| Completely likely | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Very likely | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Fairly likely | 11 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 8 | |||||
| Somewhat likely | 13 | 17 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 16 | |||||
| Not at all likely | 72 | 69 | 57 | 62 | 65 | 71 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 3 | |||||||||||
| HIGHER TAXES ON HIGHER CARBON EMISSION CARS | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose a higher tax on higher carbon emission cars?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 65 | 67 | 71 | 78 | 57 | 53 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 31 | 31 | 32 | 46 | 20 | 21 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 34 | 37 | 39 | 32 | 37 | 32 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 35 | 33 | 29 | 22 | 43 | 47 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 23 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 24 | 27 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 12 | 14 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 20 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 4 | |||||||||||
| LOWER TAXES ON LOWER CARBON EMISSION CARS | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose a lower tax on lower carbon emission cars?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 86 | 79 | 91 | 90 | 89 | 78 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 39 | 34 | 53 | 55 | 44 | 37 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 46 | 44 | 38 | 35 | 45 | 41 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 14 | 21 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 22 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 11 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 14 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 4 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 5 | |||||||||||
| BUILDING NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose building new nuclear power plants in (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.)?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 45 | 49 | 58 | 32 | 36 | 52 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 13 | 15 | 29 | 12 | 12 | 20 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 32 | 34 | 30 | 20 | 25 | 32 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 55 | 51 | 42 | 68 | 64 | 48 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 35 | 31 | 21 | 28 | 29 | 31 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 20 | 20 | 21 | 40 | 35 | 17 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 6 | |||||||||||
| INCREASING THE NUMBER OF WIND FARMS | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose a large increase in the number of wind farms in (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.)?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 87 | 89 | 91 | 90 | 79 | 92 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 48 | 49 | 64 | 55 | 34 | 61 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 39 | 40 | 27 | 35 | 45 | 31 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 13 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 8 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 7 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 7 | |||||||||||
| GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR BIO-FUELS | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by the government of (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.) for bio-fuels?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 77 | 84 | 90 | 85 | 65 | 71 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 23 | 39 | 54 | 38 | 23 | 22 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 55 | 45 | 36 | 47 | 42 | 49 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 23 | 16 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 29 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 16 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 21 | 21 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 7 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 8 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
| TABLE 8 | |||||||||||
| GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER | |||||||||||
"How much do you favor or oppose a financial subsidy by the government of (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.S.) for the development of nuclear power?" |
|||||||||||
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults |
|||||||||||
| Great Britain |
France | Italy | Spain | Germany | United States |
||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||
| Unweighted base | 1087 | 1076 | 1045 | 1109 | 1111 | 1020 | |||||
| FAVOR (NET) | 42 | 48 | 62 | 36 | 34 | 46 | |||||
| Strongly favor | 10 | 11 | 30 | 13 | 7 | 12 | |||||
| Favor more than oppose | 33 | 37 | 32 | 23 | 27 | 35 | |||||
| OPPOSE (NET) | 58 | 52 | 38 | 64 | 66 | 54 | |||||
| Oppose more than favor | 38 | 33 | 20 | 35 | 32 | 37 | |||||
| Strongly oppose | 20 | 19 | 17 | 30 | 34 | 17 | |||||
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding |
|||||||||||
Tags:
© 2010 Created by AlternativeEnergy.com
You need to be a member of Alternative Energy dot Com to add comments!
Join Alternative Energy dot Com